Do we Know How to Differentiate a Coach From a Mentor?

Only a few years ago, the use of the terms Coach and Mentor seemed to be reserved for specialized technicians, human resources departments or consulting firms in the sector. In our days, the meaning of these words has been vulgarized, and it is common for them to appear in traditional and digital media. In addition, there is a diffuse sense that both practices are analogous and that everyone can put them into practice, almost anywhere or to achieve the most capricious objectives, however frivolous or inappropriate it may be.

Do we Know How to Differentiate a Coach From a Mentor?

There are those who dare to call ‘Mentor’ to that ‘friend of the family’ who is going to plug you in to be hired in a powerful business group of communication, while other people commit the audacity to call ‘Coach’ the fitness monitor of that gym in which people enroll to attend only during the month of September. We have nothing to reproach either of us, but it would not hurt to learn to distinguish Coaching and Mentoring and to differentiate how they can be useful in the career development of marketing and journalism professionals, in the broadest sense .

Do we really know the precise differences between Coaching and Mentoring? It is clear that some communication professionals do know them and many others confuse the concepts and the usefulness of both methodologies. We will try to clarify the terms.

Melbourne Business Coach is a professional specifically trained to accompany, motivate and guide other professionals in learning and in the development of a set of interrelated concrete skills . The Coach is a professional Coaching, he earns his living with it, although this seems obvious to us.

For example, a Coach can help you find or find a job and accompany you in the process until you reach the goal. Also a coach can get you to find the necessary levers so that you feel safe when communicating and transmitting your messages well in public.

For its part, Mentoring is a process of professional and personal growth. It is about promoting the improvement of individual or collective talent, in a broad sense . In Mentoring, a person with experience in a specific field advises, supports, guides and helps someone less experienced or a team to realize their professional, work or business objectives in the medium term, always within a relationship of full commitment and mutual trust.

The Mentor is not a professional Mentoring, does not earn a living as such. For example, if a communication agency has problems to undertake business development tasks, it can count on a sales mentor, experienced, mature and veteran, to ‘accompany’, orient and encourage the improvement of business skills of the whole of the organization. Also a mentor specialized in digital skills can get a manager to participate in the conversation on social networks in their community without fear of being wrong.

The Mentoring pursues individual and group professional development goals and often extended over a long period of time. On the contrary, Coaching can be done with a shorter duration (only a few months) and always focuses on specific skills and attitudes that are set in a short and medium term action plan.

To little that we review opinions and articles of different means and communicators, we will verify that both methodologies mix and confuse until the exhaustion and the satiety, in spite of being tools with great utility and potential for companies and professionals of the communication.

The Benefits of Having a Good Business Mentor

No entrepreneur who has achieved success has achieved it alone.

We all need help, and even the most inventive and innovative entrepreneurs need some support from time to time. It is always good to receive advice from someone who has more experience than us, and in this aspect, having a good Business Mentor Melbourne can be very beneficial for any entrepreneur . Most successful entrepreneurs have had, at some time or other throughout their career, at least one counselor who has listened to their ideas and indicated the best way forward. A mentor is someone who has more experience in the business world than you, and who can offer valuable advice .

The relationship between a mentor and his enterprising apprentice can be beneficial for both parties; The mentor usually discovers new innovative business ideas through his student, while the entrepreneur can absorb valuable wisdom from his mentor. Through the  Go Global Program of Business Innovation  you will have a variety of prestigious entrepreneurs and mentors to help you move forward. 

The benefits of having a good business mentor
5 remarkable advantages of having a mentor

The world of business can be very hard, and sometimes you have to fight not only to prosper, but also to survive. In this in mind, why not take advantage of all the opportunities that present themselves to help you achieve success? Mentors represent a great opportunity. Among the many advantages of having one, the following stand out:

·  Your mentor will have seen and experienced everything in the business . The experience of mentors is the most important weapon in their arsenal when it comes to advising those who seek them. Most likely, your mentor will have a level of experience infinitely superior to yours. Be smart and take advantage of this experience to develop your own knowledge; learn from the mistakes of others before committing them yourself. It is also good to learn from the successes of others, in addition to their failures.

·   You do not have to pay your business mentor . Money is what moves the world, and you will undoubtedly want to save whenever you can. For unlike coaches or consultants, mentors usually offer their services without charging anything in return. But at least you are expected to invite him to a cafe in exchange for his time.

·   Your mentor will help you expand your contact list . Being a person with experience in the business world, it is expected that your mentor is well connected with other entrepreneurs and influential people. Of course you’re interested in connecting with these people as soon as possible; since in more than what you know , what matters is who you know . Having good contacts is the first step towards the internationalization of your company.

·   Sometimes your mentor will be the only one who can help you . Being an entrepreneur and boss, it is not so easy to receive advice and help with what you should do. It always brings confidence to have someone who listens to your ideas and gives you that second opinion that you are looking for and valued. Your mentor may even give you emotional support in difficult times, too.

·   You can establish a good and lasting relationship with your mentor . You can rest easy knowing that your mentor has no hidden plans to steal or cheat you because he does not receive financial funds. Nor will be trying to sell anything or interfere with the operation of your business. You will both share the same goal; get the advance of your company, and even internationalization. This forms an ideal basis for a fruitful and respectful relationship. Trust your mentor; listen, learn and act. After that, you will only enjoy success. 

An Overview about the Inductive Method of Research

This post is all about Business Study Notes. BusinessStudyNotes is all about BBA, Mba, and B.com & M.com related studies and notes online. We may also say that the students of MBA, BBA, and B.com & M.com may easily get ready for their exams through business study notes. Anyhow, let’s talk about research methodology.

This methodology is originally associated with the work of scientific knowledge, from observing the phenomena or facts of reality to the universal law that contains them. Summing up the words of Mill (1973), scientific investigations would begin with the observation of the facts, in a free and unprejudiced way, and later – and by inference – universal laws are formulated on the facts and by induction would obtain even more general affirmations. They are called theories. Francis Bacon at the beginning of the 17th century, in very general terms, it consists of establishing certain universal statements based on experience that is, ascending logically through.

According to this method, it is admitted that each set of facts of the same nature is governed by a Universal Law. The scientific objective is to enunciate that Universal Law based on the observation of the facts.

Considering its content, those who postulate this research method distinguish several types of statements:

Individuals, if they refer to a specific fact.
Universal, those derived from the research process and empirically tested.
Observational, refers to an obvious fact.

Emphasizing the empiricist nature of this methodology, the sequence followed in this research process can be summarized in the following points.

1. A stage of observation and recording of the facts must be carried out.
2. Then proceed to the analysis of the observed, establishing as a consequence clear definitions of each of the concepts analyzed.
3. Subsequently, the classification of the previous elements will be carried out.
4. The last stage of this method is dedicated to the formulation of scientific propositions or universal statements, inferred from the research process that has been carried out.

According to these classical empiricists, scientific theories should be considered those formed by sets of empirically tested statements that either describe firm facts or are inductive generalizations of those. The theory is not accepted until it has been proven. In this way, we see in these empiricists a frontal rejection towards all theoretical speculation about fields of knowledge in which an empirical test cannot be made.

This inductive approach of science began to collapse gradually in the second half of the nineteenth century under the influence of the writings of Match, Poincare and Duhem, at the beginning of our century began to take a virtually opposite view in the works of the Vienna Circle. Some contemporary authors have harshly criticized this methodology (Hempel, 1966, pp. 11-12, Medawar, 1969, p.40) arguing a series of questions that question its effectiveness, such as the impossibility of compiling all the facts related to the phenomenon in which we are interested or the fact that experimentation is only used as a simple procedure to generate information.

On the other hand, the so-called “induction problem “it is a subject that presents certain implications even for those who do not subscribe to the inductivity methodology. The question arises in the face of doubt whether inductive evidence can be used to predict future events; consequently, the problem of induction arises from our inability to provide rational elements that can be used to explain something beyond the evidence available.